February 15, 2004

 

The Epistle to the Romans

Chapter 14 – Study Questions

 

1.      What is the general attitude that Christians should have towards one another (in the context of this chapter)?

First, we have to establish what the context of the chapter is.  Paul is writing to the church in Rome, which, as we have mentioned many times, was made up of both Jews and Gentiles.  In this chapter he addresses differences that might have arisen between the two groups (or even within each group) given the traditions in the midst of which the Jews had been brought up.  Let us not forget that most of these people were not born in Christian homes, per se, but rather were made Christians during adulthood.  Many of these people could not drop their “baggage” right away.  Many of them kept the dietary laws of the Old Testament and some of them kept observing the Jewish feasts.

 

A crucial point to keep in mind as part of the general context of the chapter is that Paul here is not talking about people who believed that the observance of the dietary laws and of the Jewish festivals (or of the Law for that matter) was necessary for one’s salvation.  He is talking about people who chose to still observe these things because they thought they were good or preferred practices.  In Romans, Paul has already addressed the foolishness of the position that says that one can earn God’s favor by obeying the Law.  Paul treats these issues as adiaphora (morally indifferent or morally neutrally).

 

In the first few verses of the chapter, we have the answer to our first study question.  The attitude that Christians should have towards one another is one of acceptance and of welcome, based on God’s attitude towards us in Christ.  In disagreements regarding “doubtful things” they should be accepting of one’s weakness (or newness) in faith.

 

2.      “What is the chief end of man?”

We glean the answer to this question (in the context of the chapter) from verses 6-9, 6He who observes the day, observes it to the Lord; and he who does not observe the day, to the Lord he does not observe it. He who eats, eats to the Lord, for he gives God thanks; and he who does not eat, to the Lord he does not eat, and gives God thanks. 7For none of us lives to himself, and no one dies to himself. 8For if we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord. Therefore, whether we live or die, we are the Lord's. 9For to this end Christ died and rose and lived again, that He might be Lord of both the dead and the living.  The chief end of man is to glorify God, regardless of what his opinion is on these adiaphora issues.   Both parties of a debate on one of these issues have to realize that, as verse 10 suggests, they are accountable to the Lord Himself for their views.   The underlying principle is that the resolution of such issues, though possible, is superseded in importance by the unity of the Church and by the integrity of Christian fellowship.  A united and strong Church is all the more able to glorify God and work out His will into this world.

 

 

3.      In v. 14-23, Paul encourages us to avoid being “stumbling blocks” for new believers (or weak believers). Is this exhortation absolute? Are we always to defer to our brother’s weakness?

During our discussion of the chapter we have established a few principles based on the text, regarding approaching these morally neutral issues.  As a general rule, in potential disagreements or disputes, “[we should resolve] not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother’s way.” (v. 13) Paul does not qualify this statement and we should not do so either.  What would be, practically, the way to approach such a situation?  As Christian brothers, we should in all love and patience try to show them the error of their conviction; however, if no headway is made, we should decide to be accommodating of our brother’s beliefs.  We should, at the same time, ensure we are not compromising our Bible-supported position.  In even more practical terms, if you know that your brother is “offended or made weak” by something that you do, then avoid doing that particular thing when that brother is around.  Some might argue that this is an encouragement to hypocrisy.  It is not really; your convictions have not changed and your brother is aware of the fact.  You are merely seeing what the priorities are.  The fellowship with your brother for whom the Lord of glory died is immensely more important than his accepting of your views.

 

This is an appropriate place to also mention that a strong Christian who is very much convinced of the extent and meaning of Christian freedom should not try to cajole his weak brother into doing things that he would otherwise consider questionable.  Forcing someone to act against their conscience in this manner is dangerous and can lead to sin, according to v. 23.

 

 

Chapter 14 was once again a very practical chapter.  It offered valuable teaching that is very much applicable to situations in our lives as Christian believers.  Let’s pray that when we are faced with a debate on one of these adiaphora issues, we will have the wisdom to apply what we have learned.  Thanks be to God!

 

Sorin Voicu-Comendant

Dallas, TX.